Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince



*****Spoilers Contained Within***************

So it took two tries but I was able to see the highly anticipated (by me) sixth installment of the Harry Potter series both last night and today.

It's a long story but needless to say, I saw the friggen thing, and was in no way whats so ever disappointed.

I loved the movie. From the opening sequence, Dumbledore placing his uninjured hand on Harry's arm and ushering him to saftey after the happening at the Ministry that concluded the fifth film through the films final shot, I was absolutely captivated.

I will say only this in criticism, I don't think there was a need for the added scene where Death Eaters attack the Burrow. It wasn't needed there, and doesn't make a ton of sense. Aside from that, I am totally ok with all of the additions and subtractions that were made.

Many of the things that bothered me in the past were centered around the important details that were left out (who made that darn Marauder's Map anyway?) and the poor acting or directing, specifically with the adult characters and Michael Gambon's Dumbledore.

I had no issues with these factors in this film.

Snape was his best, Dumbledore was great, Slughorn although different from what I pictured was wonderful.

This according to Salon.com:

"By the series' completion, Yates will have directed half of the "Harry Potter" movies, and that mutes the surprise element a bit. But "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" at least ensures that the franchise's remaining movies are in good hands. Yates understands the bond, and the continuity, that's so essential between the old and the young. In one of the movie's loveliest scenes, Broadbent's professor Slughorn, slightly sozzled, describes to Harry a piece of magic worked by one of his former students. He describes this wonderful, delicate feat so vividly that his words are more effective than visuals would be. And, as it turns out, this bit of magic had been worked by Harry's long-dead mother, Lily. It was, Slughorn tells Harry, peering at him as if through mist, "the most beautiful magic." That's a measure of how subtle a spectacle Yates has given us with "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince." The most beautiful magic in it is left unseen. And still, it emerges with absolute clarity."

The scene with the "Lilly" was perfect.

The subtle changes to the plot did not ruin the film.

The thing that I liked the most was the humor. The film was very funny without being a comedy. The young people, specifcally Ron, were hilarious. I really loved this film.

I think that it will be interesting to see how they mix in some of the plot items that were left out. We never learned about Marvolo Gaunt or Hebsibha Smith, we didn't see Bill Weasley and Fleur.

The film ended with a little hint about Ron and Harry growing apart a bit, which will be interesting to see how that develops.

I love that they have about five hours of film time left to bring this all together. And I now have complete faith in David Yates and company, I was happy with Phoenix and loved Prince.

Worth the wait. It was perfect. And Harry has the fever.

3 comments:

carly said...

i just saw it last night. i agree with you that a lot of the additions and subtractions didn't really phase me. however, i wish that the big fight scene at hogwarts wasn't downplayed (i think they wasted the special effects budget on the burrow scene) and that they had taken two seconds for dumbledore to hint at what the horcruxes are. but all in all i understand the choices that were made and the changes didn't take too much away from the book.

i loved the lilly scene! and i thought lavender was pretty good.

and if we didn't get the funeral, let's hope they don't mess up the shell cottage scene in the next one.

Terry Gilmore said...

The fight scene at the end should have happened, your telling me no one knew they were in the school making all that ruckus.

I saw pictures already from the shell cottage scene, so at least we knew they filmed it.

I was talking with someone and we were both like, why don't they film two versions all of these films, literally write two scrips.

The theatrical script where they make the movie they will show in theaters, and the "Book" movie where they follow the books down to the slightest detail.

I would love that and would pay to go see both.

I thought all the kids in the movie were great, funny, emotional, Ron drugged up was great.

The Harry scene with Felix was one of my favorite from the book and he nailed it.

He acted kind of drunk, it was great.

Loved the movie and today the more I have thought about it the more I love it.

carly said...

yeah the felix scenes were awesome! dana and i were laughing our asses off when harry started clapping after hagrid and slughorn got done singing, it was great!

and i'm with you on the two scripts deal. i would totally watch both. they wouldn't even need to be word for word, just have JK have the final say on what was in it.

i definitely wanna see it again because i feel like i'm always more critical the first time around and the second time you can forget about how you would've done everything and just enjoy it.